Thread: Not Guilty
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 6th July 2011, 10:36
MikeRavens MikeRavens is offline
Quarantined User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mousie View Post
The jury hardly deliberated though. I thought all those search engine searches she was doing for chloroform and neck breaking would be good enough. Ugh, so frustrating!



really? you wanted to giver her the DEATH PENALTY based on that?.......Good Lord, thank God you weren't part of the jury.



There is a difference between TRIAL LAW and TV JUNK LAW and bad science that you based your opinion from.

What is so scary about this is that the government can charge anybody with the DEATH PENALTY with that lack of evidence when nobody knows how and when the victim died. Thank God for juries and our system of law because in other countries she would have been stone to death or shot not on the evidence but her character and way of life.
Reply With Quote