|
Props on a job well done with the post BUT.... you still didnt answer the last question. heh.. thats ok, I guess i can be called a 'so-called' scientist of yours, because i predicted you wouldnt be able to answer it. Its funny your so cought-up on your own game that you failed to answer a question a child could have answered. You dont have to be an artist to answer this Eddie. Its hard to say "I dont know" doesnt it?.
But enough of that, just wanted to comment on your post, again... i'm not here to outwit anybody. And i'm going to leave the bible here for just one second, everything i assert is of your own beliefs and 'nice thoughts' as theories. So lets beggin.
You quoted " Hutchinson says, "The marvels of the scientific world are little revelations of God?s creative thoughts. ."
First of all... couldnt you come up with one yourself. Not to disrispect, but you know.. "different strokes for different folks" He said "creative thoughts"... funny, as I already showed you CANT come-up with(create) something that doesnt exist. You cant create something from nothing... however this is what you saying, thats absurd! You can use things that dont exist to assume things that does, which is, by the way the basis for science.. thus why they can say "this is how it happened, because we are seeing a pattern similar to what we are studying wich we didnt see" such as the formation of Galaxies and things like that. It always amazes me how they can say THIS is how it happened when they themselves were not even there... they call this "reconstruction". You have to be kidding. But anyhow, thats your stroke,.. and i dont want to know anything about you stroking anything... lets focus on facts here.
You said: "In point of fact, though testing and reproducing or repeating the results of the tests, scientists can discover a scientific explanation which is biunique with prediction. Such a scientific explanation of the way things are is in a one-to-one correlation with predictability. And the results are the scientific laws discovered concerning the universe."
Ok... In science everything is labeled. For example, everything thats been tested and prooven goes to the FACT file, everything that is YET to be prooven goes to the THEORY file, and everything that cannot be explained goes to the SUPERNATURAL/UNEXPLAINABLE file. Such supernatural occurances of the bible such as "The Flood" and "The Walls of Jericoh" cannot be explained on HOW it took place but that in FACT it DID take place. So even when you have mud in your shoes and pictorial proof and samples that it DID happened you conclude that as "ZERO" just because it goes far beyond than the "finite brain"... thats just plain stupid, no offence. Even secular television showed a story on this, archeologist found that the walls of Jericoh didnt fall forward or backwards, it is prooven that the walls fell straight down as if the earth opened up and swallow'd a wall big (wide) enough to hold around 7 to 10 chariots side by side at the top of the wall. An earthquake? no earthquake is that precise to take down a wall that big and tall and not destroy the city it self. So this falls into the "supernatural/unexplainable" file. and to you that is ZERO, right? Eventhough it showes that it did happened,.. but just because you cant explain HOW it happened you dismiss it as "oh thast just fake" or "ZERO".. that to me is a "weak try to keep your pride". You work on the law of averages... but what about the remaining factor? its to say "after we tested and retested we noticed that in 100 test 90 of them came out the same, so we can conclude that it did happen this way" but what about that remaining percent? as small and insignificant as it may seem, its still there. Maybe things didnt happen within that average, maybe it happened within the remaining factor. You'll never know. Science can never proof things 100%... its the flaw of mankind, but no!.. lets not call it flaw.. lets call it "ZERO" or "FAKE".. lets blame Christians!
Isnt it amazing... that we have the worlds biggest names in science trying to create, even the simplest life they can, JUST to proove that no intelligence was necessary to create it in the first place! Yet these are the very same people that want to have you believe everything just happened by chance or random. SMART?!
Note: I'm stating facts of the bible because its been prooven even by your so called scientist, astrologers, archeologist, cosmologist, and theologians. After years of research, the bible was established as a historical document on itself. You know what that means? it means it was prooven, tested, and retested, the bible still stands as the oldest Historical record ever written. The kings, rules, people, dates, and even events noted on this book are all prooven to be true. Fake?.. you seem like a guy who does his homework, do the research! The bible is translated into every language and sold more copies than any other book in history. But let me remind you of what you said here before; In point of fact, through testing and reproducing or repeating the results of the tests, scientists can discover a scientific explanation which is biunique with prediction. Such a scientific explanation of the way things are is in a one-to-one correlation with predictability." Let me tell you a biunique prediction. "The Earth and the heavens shall pass away, but My Words (The Bible) will remain forever." In History, since the beginning of notion of scriptures, Kings and rulers, scientist, theologians, archeologist, astrologers, and such like have all tried to disproof the bible, they are all dead, but the book still remains. Thats your correlation with a biblical prediction (prophecy) Eddie.
You said "For the term "god" refers to that which is beyond the boundaries of finite human understanding, and is therefore in effect NOTHING. And anything that is multiplied by nothing, zilch, or zero is NOTHING or ZERO,[...]"
So you prooven you can multiply, but Who said anything about multiplying, we are on the basics here Ed, we are adding and subtracting! 1 + 1 - 1 is still ONE! You can even do it in reverse, the answer's still the same. This is our (Christians) "ONE" and anything you multiply by "1" IS SOMETHING!
Oh, and another thing. What percent of the Human brain do we use during consious state?... do we use 100%? No... still we only use but a small percent, but based on what your telling be that BIG percent we dont use is nothing? Looks like you have your hands full Ed, because in order for you to say "anything beyond the boundaries of 'finite' human understanding [...] is NOTHING" you have to consider the brain because that is in fact what you use for logic, rationalize, and understand things. So anything outside of the small percent we use to rationalize is "NOTHING".. your calling yourself dumb buddy. Again.. no offence... it seems to me that even sience cannot be founded on "small-percentage" people with a BIG percent of AIR in their heads. How can you trust that?
And lastly, You said: "Only the religionists can have a religion of nothingness, because they introduce the element of their belief or faith into a failed attempt to prove the existence of "God".
Let me ask you this; How can you proove the existance of Cristobal Columbus? or the first president of the united states? or even the engeneer who invented the automobile engine? is it THAT evident to you that they exist? So is God, as a matter of fact... your standing on the biggest evidence of a "supreme intelligent source" to be blaimed for the biggest accident of the universe - "life"
nuff said
|