[Eddier1]

Well, you have written a screed full of twists and turns that rivals a snake. You act like a "know it all", and won't even accept that the human understanding has boundaries whether or no one uses ones brains to its fullest capacity or only the reptilian stem of the brain like you do.

When I wrote my essay about the MIT scholar, you didn't even exist in memory; I never met you nor read you, and now that I have you don't interest me one bit. I am just tidying up concerning my post. Are you offended by what I just wrote, then I am not a hypocrite like you who has hurled a bunch of insults at me, and then spit out like venom..."no offense" after everyone of them: in short I will not say like you "no offense" but will be open and above board, without a shred of hypocrisy, and say to you not 'no offense' but instead that you disgust me!

All you fundamentalist, bible-thumping religionists are superstition-mongers, snake eaters and fire worshippers of the hell you talk so much about. You are HYPOCRITES, and given to dissembling in a manner that is of a pig-dog lying bastard. Your mothers all should have had abortions before you were born. You disgust me without peradventure of a doubt. That is all I will give to you on scepticism versus religionist belief. This discussion is over.

YOU'RE AN IDIOT AND I AM FINISHED WITH YOU!