[GodCatcher]

You know... I honestly didnt expect that from you. But thats ok, i can understand where your comming from, i guess it must have been too much for you, but then again, it was just simply put... i dont understand why you would react in such a form of a child without love. I dont pretend to know it all, i just imparted a few thoughts, YOU on the other hand, want to sound smart even in your writings. Your wanting to "end this discussion" seems a weak attempt to keep your dignity by putting ME down.. or atleast trying, i'll give you that, but to no avail.
"The famous bully in middle school who picks on kids smaller than him in order to hide his short commings and insecurities.. its the only way he can feel good, by making others look bad, therefor drawing the attention to someone else as a "fool" or "weak" so people wont see that He is really the 'fool with a weakness'."

The "no offence" was just that, NO OFFENCE to YOU. I didnt pretend to lay it easy with that, i wasnt calling YOU stupid or anything like that, I was calling what YOU BELIEVE stupid. Just like you would say the same about me. I wouldnt get offended, why should i? I'm sure about what I belive. You got offended?.. not my problem, sorry to say. There's an old saing (not biblical, but secular) that says "The truth hurts." All i got to say is thanks for prooving that. But that gave you no right to answer the way you did in the end. I discust you? you sounded repulsive after what you wrote!. You're right, this discussion is over, not because you say so, but because you dont know how to conduce your weak argument (wich you started) and just simply dont have manners. No matter what you call me Ed, or wishing my "non-existance", i wouldnt have never acted that way, not even wish you death, not even an atheist should act that way, its called human courtesy or "nice manners. Wasnt it you who told me "not to get offended" by the way you treated my post in your reply? Boy, i didnt even treated you half bad as you did me, and i should take it easy while you take it like this? I'm confused... who's the hipocrate?

You wrote: "Okay, okay so you think that being recognized as a fool for Christ is a "dis". Hmmm, I thought that was the thing that you religionists do and it is an acceptable practice. Did I seem over critical about your stuff about faith and creationism?, I didn't mean to be if that is the way you took it."

Well... I didnt mean to be "over critical" about your beliefs if thats the way YOU took it. I'm really sorry, its aim was never that. But hey, if you still want to be like that, fine! I cant change you and i dont pretend to know you. You called me a hipocrate? I resent that, I am not, so why should i get offended. But, since it seems you need someone to jogg your memory once in a while (from your other post in the past), then let me remind you... better yet, have you take a look at the SECOND post you ever wrote me on page 5 and then read your last post. I could call you a hipocrate, but i'm not about to stoop to your level, but i WILL stoop LOWER than that and humbly ask for your forgiveness. FREE FOR ANYONE TO SEE IT! Its a free world, you're free to belive what you want as well as me and everybody else. I hope you consider this... i dont need an essay this time though, the subject will be dropped wether you forgive me or not, its your choice... either way i wont get offended.. i promise. sorry.

peace and God bless

nuff said