Go Back   PuertoRico.com Discussion Forum > Society > Politics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2003, 17:55
Joshue Joshue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally posted by Ecuajey
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
Well Bro let me put it this way. I agree with that some of the foreign companies cash flow get out, But who you think owns the Franchises station in the island.
Even then, the other companies, pay Taxes here, and bring employment. Good commerce, is not bad.
Pareces como buena gente, but you always seem to bypass my points, lol. One point is that those companies do not pay much taxs in Puerto Rico. If it is a factory they either get a complete tax-break or pay a few percent of what they make to the island's treasury. If it is a foreign megastore, they pay property taxes, but many times that goes to the mall they are on. Also, about employment, megastores mostly provide low-paying, part-time jobs, while owning your own business can be a full-time, well-paying job. However, as I wrote, I'm not against competition, especially in the global market. I just believe that the PR government should hold domestic businesses as a priority, because as I quoted, they really are what keeps the PR economy floating.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2003, 17:57
Joshue Joshue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 787
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by Ecuajey
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
Well Bro let me put it this way. I agree with that some of the foreign companies cash flow get out, But who you think owns the Franchises station in the island.
Even then, the other companies, pay Taxes here, and bring employment. Good commerce, is not bad.
Pareces como buena gente, but you always seem to bypass my points, lol. One point is that those companies do not pay much taxs in Puerto Rico. If it is a factory they either get a complete tax-break or pay a few percent of what they make to the island's treasury. If it is a foreign megastore, they pay property taxes, but many times that goes to the mall they are on. Also, about employment, megastores mostly provide low-paying, part-time jobs, while owning your own business can be a full-time, well-paying job. However, as I wrote, I'm not against competition, especially in the global market. I just believe that the PR government should hold domestic businesses as a priority, because as I quoted, they really are what keeps the PR economy floating.
First WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT,

I agree that our commerce should be one of the priorities.
I am not bypassing your point, you call this thread "la isla de la propaganda" exposing it like negative, I am telling you is not. The factories that takes Tax breaks give employment to the people that then pay income tax. You brought something very interesting, it was that dammed tendency of part time employment. That Only hurt us the people. Our economy is just going down, is this stupid and obsolete commonwealth.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2003, 22:54
Ecuajey Ecuajey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
First WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT, I agree that our commerce should be one of the priorities. I am not bypassing your point, you call this thread "la isla de la propaganda" exposing it like negative, I am telling you is not. The factories that takes Tax breaks give employment to the people that then pay income tax. You brought something very interesting, it was that dammed tendency of part time employment. That Only hurt us the people. Our economy is just going down, is this stupid and obsolete commonwealth.
I must as you that same question: "what the heck was that." You ask me that question and then respond to most of my points....lol!

I called this thread "La isla de la propoganda," because that is the title of the article I linked here....That factory point was mine, not the article's. Therefore, you just contradicted yourself by saying that the article title is not negative when you just agreed that is, which can be infered by the "that damned tendency of part time employment" comment, which is why that article's author does not like Puerto Rico's consumerism. As for the factory point, I wrote that I believe in competition, therefore let the factories stay, but they should follow the laws of the land, pay the people decent wages, and pay their share to the PR treasury, because that income-tax collection you speek of is very flawed on right now, which should change, because then all those factories are offering is only employment. Therefore, those employees will be the only ones receiving income through those factories...to be used in buying foreign-owned, made, and distributed products. See the connection? That's why the PR economy is in the state it is in, which I can see you agree sucks.
__________________
Rafael Tufiño
Psicoanalisis del vejigante

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2003, 23:09
Joshue Joshue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally posted by Ecuajey
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
First WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT, I agree that our commerce should be one of the priorities. I am not bypassing your point, you call this thread "la isla de la propaganda" exposing it like negative, I am telling you is not. The factories that takes Tax breaks give <a href="http://0-29.com?go=employment" onmouseover="window.status = 'goto: employment';return 1" onmouseout="window.status=''">employment</a> to the people that then pay income tax. You brought something very interesting, it was that dammed tendency of part time <a href="http://get-certified.net?go=employment" onmouseover="window.status = 'goto: employment';return 1" onmouseout="window.status=''">employment</a>. That Only hurt us the people. Our economy is just going down, is this stupid and obsolete commonwealth.
I must as you that same question: "what the heck was that." You ask me that question and then respond to most of my points....lol!

I called this thread "La isla de la propoganda," because that is the title of the article I linked here....That factory point was mine, not the article's. Therefore, you just contradicted yourself by saying that that article title is not negative when you just agreed that is, which can be infered by the "that damned tendency of part time <a href="http://0-29.com?go=employment" onmouseover="window.status = 'goto: employment';return 1" onmouseout="window.status=''">employment</a>." As for the factory point, I wrote that I believe in competition, therefore let the factories stay, but they should follow the laws of the land, pay the people decent wages, and pay their share to the PR treasury, because that income-tax collection you speek of is very flawed on right now, which should change, because then all those factories are offering is only <a href="http://get-certified.net?go=employment" onmouseover="window.status = 'goto: employment';return 1" onmouseout="window.status=''">employment</a>. Therefore, those employees will be the only ones receiving income through those factories...to be used in buying foreign-owned, made, and distributed products. See the connection? That's why the PR economy is in the state it is, which I can see you agree sucks.
No men, when i said [what the heck was that] is because my post had repeated twice, look up and please know what I am talking about. Well bro, I have to go because I have to work. I am sorry I have to go, my reply is coming. it is not disrespect. Bye see you Bro.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2003, 23:24
Ecuajey Ecuajey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,560
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
No men, when i said [what the heck was that] is because my post had repeated twice, look up and please know what I am talking about. Well bro, I have to go because I have to work. I am sorry I have to go, my reply is coming. it is not disrespect. Bye see you Bro.
Yeah, I saw that repeated post, but I wanted to see if that was what you really meant. Anyway, reply when you can, I don't really care, lol.
__________________
Rafael Tufiño
Psicoanalisis del vejigante

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 4th December 2003, 11:06
Joshue Joshue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally posted by Ecuajey
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
First WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT, I agree that our commerce should be one of the priorities. I am not bypassing your point, you call this thread "la isla de la propaganda" exposing it like negative, I am telling you is not. The factories that takes Tax breaks give employment to the people that then pay income tax. You brought something very interesting, it was that dammed tendency of part time employment. That Only hurt us the people. Our economy is just going down, is this stupid and obsolete commonwealth.
I must as you that same question: "what the heck was that." You ask me that question and then respond to most of my points....lol!

I called this thread "La isla de la propoganda," because that is the title of the article I linked here....That factory point was mine, not the article's. Therefore, you just contradicted yourself by saying that the article title is not negative when you just agreed that is, which can be infered by the "that damned tendency of part time employment" comment, which is why that article's author does not like Puerto Rico's consumerism. As for the factory point, I wrote that I believe in competition, therefore let the factories stay, but they should follow the laws of the land, pay the people decent wages, and pay their share to the PR treasury, because that income-tax collection you speek of is very flawed on right now, which should change, because then all those factories are offering is only employment. Therefore, those employees will be the only ones receiving income through those factories...to be used in buying foreign-owned, made, and distributed products. See the connection? That's why the PR economy is in the state it is in, which I can see you agree sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 4th December 2003, 11:11
Joshue Joshue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 787
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Ecuajey
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshue
First WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT, I agree that our commerce should be one of the priorities. I am not bypassing your point, you call this thread "la isla de la propaganda" exposing it like negative, I am telling you is not. The factories that takes Tax breaks give employment to the people that then pay income tax. You brought something very interesting, it was that dammed tendency of part time employment. That Only hurt us the people. Our economy is just going down, is this stupid and obsolete commonwealth.
I must as you that same question: "what the heck was that." You ask me that question and then respond to most of my points....lol!
I called this thread "La isla de la propoganda," because that is the title of the article I linked here....That factory point was mine, not the article's. Therefore, you just contradicted yourself by saying that the article title is not negative when you just agreed that is, which can be infered by the "that damned tendency of part time employment" comment, which is why that article's author does not like Puerto Rico's consumerism. As for the factory point, I wrote that I believe in competition, therefore let the factories stay, but they should follow the laws of the land, pay the people decent wages, and pay their share to the PR treasury, because that income-tax collection you speek of is very flawed on right now, which should change, because then all those factories are offering is only employment. Therefore, those employees will be the only ones receiving income through those factories...to be used in buying foreign-owned, made, and distributed products. See the connection? That's why the PR economy is in the state it is in, which I can see you agree sucks.
WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT, IT DID IT AGAIN. MY COMPUTER OR THE SERVER ARE STUPID. FUNNY THOUGH. Anyway.

When I said dammed tendency of part time I was Attacking the dammed policy of the commonwealth economy, regarding wage not propaganda. Where is the contradiction? Propaganda is the systematic propagation of a doctrine, or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause. a lot of commerce propaganda, I may add, I think is good. consumerism is not bad at all, people is free to do or buy whatever they want.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:22.