HezBULLah has 10,000 Rockets!

[EL_BORICUA]

Well anyone with 1/2 an ounce of humanity should be shocked at the destruction and loss of life in Lebanon although there has been destruction and death in Israel it pales in comparison to whats happening in Lebanon,as a christian I do not believe that Arab lives are worth less than Israeli lives.
For some reason the religious right who seem to be hooked on the Old Testament agree with this wholesale killing of Arabs,I listen to their arguments and they seem to be hoping for the end of days,and not making very christian comments.
As a christian myself I prefer the New Testament after all our lord himself when asked about when the Kingdom of Israel would be restored he stated,"It is not for you to know the times or seasons that the Father has established by his own authority".
I do believe the religious right is acting out of racial prejudice and anti-Arab bias,lets face it Arabs are not the most popular people in the U.S. and I must say that its been through the actions of some Arabs themselves.
Radical Islam is a dangerous thing,merciless beheadings,targeting civilians,and worst of all asking their own children to blow themselves up is something I cannot understand and never will,as I have said before extremism whether it be Muslim,Christian,or Jewish is dangerous,the Bush administration has failed miserably in its foreign policy,Bush has been a disaster to the U.S. and the world,we are facing a civil war in Iraq,you can also be sure that as soon as we leave Iraq,Muqtada Al Sadr and the Shia will take over the country,the Iranians will develop a nuclear weapon,its just a matter of time,they already have missles that can reach Israel,and lets not forget the North Koreans who already have them and are working on a delivery system that will reach the U.S.,and of course Afghanistan once the shining spot it is now falling apart the Taliban and Al Qaeda are still fighting and they have learned the old Hezbollah tactic of suicde bombers,in Latin America Hugo Chaves,Evo Morales,
Fidel Castro,the problems along the Mexican border and the rising anti-American feelings on this side of the world,and all these things are happening thanks to the cowboy from Crawford.
As I told you before AR I am not a liberal but if you want to call me one and it makes you feel better please go ahead,it sad that you have such a myopic view of the world,its very childlike to label someone this or that because one does not agree with the destruction of a country and the killing of innocents is dumb.
Surely you dont suggest that using military might takes backbone,that is laughable,Mr.Bush showed lack of backbone during Viet-Nam,and Olmert is the first PM that has no military background,either way it takes more courage to talk than fight,the U.S. and Israel have chosen to fight and its been a disaster.
Anyway there seems to be a cease fire in the works hopefully it will work,and at least the fighting in Lebanon will stop,in closing I am sad to say that the Israelis have become a nation that doesnt care as long as its own ends are met,they have certainly learned from Nazi Germany I watched IDF officers talking about launching a "BLITZKREIG" attack on Lebanon,how ironic.

[Yujike]

"Love, love will keep them together...."


Sorry to report that Condosleaza is being recalled from the Middle East by Dubya because there is a more important crisis to resolve: she is mediating the war between Mel Gibson and Israel.

[Eddier1]

THE EXTREMIST RANTING USA-HATER/COMMUNIST/MARXIST that hates God and thinks he is the center of the universe

Who but a Satan in the flesh could post such nonsense? We commies don't hate God -- that would be irrational and uncivic. We are scientific atheists and not militant atheists, the latter trying to prove that God does not exist.
On the other hand, scientific atheists have no beliefs beyond the limitations of human understranding, and therefore to us commies who are scientific GOD IS NOTHING TO US. It is like asking what is to the north of the north pole. We have our scentific moral compass in order and the extremist personalists who are 'fundie' religionists don't have even their moral compass in order. Otherwise, they would show "christian compassion" towards those who are without a belief in God. Instead, the one on this board continously bashes everyone and everything that is against what he fanatically believes in.

Oh, he writes that he "loves me, man". What a crock that is. It is sheer hypocrisy as he says one thing and demonstrates by his extremist hateful posts that he does the opposite of what he preaches darkly. He is the DARK PREACHER OF VICIOUS HATE, and make no mistake about that!

[Yujike]

"God is nothing to us."


Especially when he/she/it appears in the the currency we love. Then we trust him/her/it

[AnotherRican]

Originally Posted by Eddier1

Who but a Satan in the flesh could post such nonsense? We commies don't hate God -- that would be irrational and uncivic. We are scientific atheists and not militant atheists, the latter trying to prove that God does not exist.
On the other hand, scientific atheists have no beliefs beyond the limitations of human understranding, and therefore to us commies who are scientific GOD IS NOTHING TO US. It is like asking what is to the north of the north pole. We have our scentific moral compass in order and the extremist personalists who are 'fundie' religionists don't have even their moral compass in order. Otherwise, they would show "christian compassion" towards those who are without a belief in God. Instead, the one on this board continously bashes everyone and everything that is against what he fanatically believes in.

Oh, he writes that he "loves me, man". What a crock that is. It is sheer hypocrisy as he says one thing and demonstrates by his extremist hateful posts that he does the opposite of what he preaches darkly. He is the DARK PREACHER OF VICIOUS HATE, and make no mistake about that!

Hey, Eddie. I know it may come to you as a total crock, but you have grown on me, man. I don't hate you. I am more amused and entertained with watching your antics and your rantings.

I find it quite amusing that you don't see your extreme narcissism, even in your last post. You are "better" because you are a "Scientific Atheist." Hmmmmm... you are even better than other atheists because you "THINK" and they don't. Now that is narcissism taken to whole new levels. Atheists are not only extreme narcissists but you have taken your narcissism to even a higher level by trashing the non-scientific atheists. That's pretty amazing to me! In other words, nothing can contain your ego. It is so huge that it must be Supreme in Being.

I am also amused that you use a "scientific moral compass" for your moral choices. Wow! What science are you looking at? If you look at Biological Science then you are just a piece of meat that can shout all it wants but if an animal stronger than you came around and ate you up... no one should cry for you. It is "scientific morality" where the human is not a valuable being but a thing that moves. Hence you and everyone else is expendable. It also makes sense you are a Commie since they see people as things to be used as part of a selfish machinery of thuggery. Go figure.

[Eddier1]

The latest by the fundie is more than just a crock. All the nonsense about narcissism adds up to making the post EVACU DE TORO.

Atheists are not sheepol; they have different methods, and the methods of militant atheists I find as ludicrous as the methods of militant theists. They are on the same level of irrationality and emoting. I find both in such a category as extremists without a valid cause -- only hollering up a hollow. Their rants and ravings are all hot air.

To be scientific in determining moral codes is worth more than all the fundie mystical rolling of the eyes and self-induced trances. Moral codes are scientifically arrived at though a consensus of public agreement as to what is the best moral conduct for human society, and such consensus is usally under the guidence, counsel, and advice of experts in ethics. That helps a public agreement to be reached in a scientific manner in terms of statistical coefficients that indicate the average among all possible moral conduct that is acceptable. The ethics that is closest to that stat coefficiency is the one that is the choice of the people arrived at as the public agreement.

[AnotherRican]

Originally Posted by Eddier1

The latest by the fundie is more than just a crock. All the nonsense about narcissism adds up to making the post EVACU DE TORO.

Atheists are not sheepol; they have different methods, and the methods of militant atheists I find as ludicrous as the methods of militant theists. They are on the same level of irrationality and emoting. I find both in such a category as extremists without a valid cause -- only hollering up a hollow. Their rants and ravings are all hot air.

To be scientific in determining moral codes is worth more than all the fundie mystical rolling of the eyes and self-induced trances. Moral codes are scientifically arrived at though a consensus of public agreement as to what is the best moral conduct for human society, and such consensus is usally under the guidence, counsel, and advice of experts in ethics. That helps a public agreement to be reached in a scientific manner in terms of statistical coefficients that indicate the average among all possible moral conduct that is acceptable. The ethics that is closest to that stat coefficiency is the one that is the choice of the people arrived at as the public agreement.

Lets see,

1. An expert of ethic decides what statistical results equal "good morality" that was arrived at by

2. Running participant morality times X times and then figuring out 1st and 2nd standard deviation.

What a laugh... If we pull in the Iranian Nation and we pull in the French (ouch!) and then pull in Syria and then pull in every thug nation, then you add Hitler, Stalin's freak Russia, the Gulag... that should give you a median of what is "normal" in terms of morals for society, especially if the expert in ethics is an atheist, a total narcissist, and biased by his own upbringing. Hmmmm. What kind of morality would that produce. If it produced a morality that said, "All atheists should be desemboweled and eliminated" then you could not say a peep. Your own "scientific morality" ate you up.

Hence, the need for a HIgher Law given by a Higher Power.

Hence the stupidity of "Scientific Morality!"