HezBULLah has 10,000 Rockets!

[Eddier1]

Lets see,

1. An expert of ethic decides what statistical results equal "good morality" that was arrived at by

This doesn't really merit a response, since it is obvious that 'public agreement' and not the decision of the experts is the deciding factor as to the best morality possible.

The experts, those who produce the credentials of having studied ethics are referenced as guides, counselors, and advisors, but THAT doesn't mean that they are the judges who decide what is PUBLICALLY AGREED UPON.

The rest of the post by the religionist fanatical nutjob is of the same low quality of intelligence -- in fact it is idiocy.
It eventually sputters out with a scream of threatening to torture and murder all atheists. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO REASON WITH THE HOMOCIDAL AR ANTICHRIST-SATAN IN THE FLESH . He should be caught and incarcerated, etc.joining the majority of prison population which are religionists of one sort or another. Atheists, on the other hand, have the lowest percentage of incarceration in the entire world. They are mostly law abiding -- even when they are revolutionary!

And what political figures and economists have to do with ethics is as ludicrous as the tautology of the phrase "good morality". All tautologies are logical fallacies, abstractions that miss the mark of a target that can never be struck in the material world.

To use such logical fallacies as a springboard for launching a diatribe, which involves a murderous threat on the part of the AR Hannibal 'the Cannibal' Lector wannabe can get the monster the opposite of what he wants. It will be more than indigestion, or irritable bowel syndrome, since death begins in the bowels -- pedazo de mierda!

Scientific socialism and its morality is based on the best methodology available. Classical scientific method was based on going from what we know and making an inference to what we don't know, and that was by predicting accurately what we didn't know, and then subjecting the results to repeated testing. In short, if the results can be repeated again and again, a hundred times for example, then a biunique or one to one correlation between the prediction and explanation is proved. Hence, to explain is to predict accurately. Nothing about prophecising or dreaming is acceptable. Only what can be classified as an invariant relationship, i.e., an iron law of the material world of Nature is ACCEPTABLE. The modern scientific method is the same and only adds statistical coefficiencies to the classical scientific method.

Stat coefficiency is a heursitic device that is most helpful in fields like ethics based on public agreements in THIS WORLD OF HUMAN SOCIETY on how humans OUGHT to behave in the here and now, and not in some fantasy world beyond the boundaries of human understanding, conscience, and social responsibility towards human society. Being a bounder that trespasses the boundaries of human understanding fantazing on objects which are not of possible experience is not only bad, but is often the path to madness and sociopathic criminality.

[AnotherRican]

It was you who suggested first the experts in ethics, not I. So don't trash me for your suggestion. Take responsibility for your own poor explanation and dementia.

Listen, dude, I have taken enough graduate statistical courses to know that stats can and are often manipulated. There are many ways of doing this. You allude to your statistical analysis for arriving at a "norm" of what morality is. HOw would that turn out in Nazi Germany where Jews were not considered humans? Factor many countries where life is cheap and what does that do to your numbers? You're a fool, basically. YOu are straining hard to make up for spitting on God's face and throwing him out of your head. YOu'll say, "What God?" Yes, the one that you knew but cannot now know or experience because you have volunteered to have your God circuits ripped out of your neurons. How do you do that? Easily... It is called making your Fat Ego take the place of the Supreme Being so that it is so filled up with itself, (in your case, via "pseudo-scientific verbage and garbage to hypnotize and stroke that ego).

If you took your infamous stat analysis to the Soviet Republic of Stalin, you would be worth about a couple of pennies. Life was cheap then. Take a large sampling and find your median and where would that median fall? Lets say that the median says that life is only worth a couple of pennies. Then you are history unless you are up in the Party Thuggery where as a god you create or manipulate the numbers to your liking, eh?

Again, you are a fool...a big self-decieved fool. The god of your ego is pretty fat with itself. That's why you chose atheism so you could be SUPREME inside your head.

Originally Posted by Eddier1

This doesn't really merit a response, since it is obvious that 'public agreement' and not the decision of the experts is the deciding factor as to the best morality possible.

The experts, those who produce the credentials of having studied ethics are referenced as guides, counselors, and advisors, but THAT doesn't mean that they are the judges who decide what is PUBLICALLY AGREED UPON.

The rest of the post by the religionist fanatical nutjob is of the same low quality of intelligence -- in fact it is idiocy.
It eventually sputters out with a scream of threatening to torture and murder all atheists. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO REASON WITH THE HOMOCIDAL AR ANTICHRIST-SATAN IN THE FLESH . He should be caught and incarcerated, etc.joining the majority of prison population which are religionists of one sort or another. Atheists, on the other hand, have the lowest percentage of incarceration in the entire world. They are mostly law abiding -- even when they are revolutionary!

And what political figures and economists have to do with ethics is as ludicrous as the tautology of the phrase "good morality". All tautologies are logical fallacies, abstractions that miss the mark of a target that can never be struck in the material world.

To use such logical fallacies as a springboard for launching a diatribe, which involves a murderous threat on the part of the AR Hannibal 'the Cannibal' Lector wannabe can get the monster the opposite of what he wants. It will be more than indigestion, or irritable bowel syndrome, since death begins in the bowels -- pedazo de mierda!

Scientific socialism and its morality is based on the best methodology available. Classical scientific method was based on going from what we know and making an inference to what we don't know, and that was by predicting accurately what we didn't know, and then subjecting the results to repeated testing. In short, if the results can be repeated again and again, a hundred times for example, then a biunique or one to one correlation between the prediction and explanation is proved. Hence, to explain is to predict accurately. Nothing about prophecising or dreaming is acceptable. Only what can be classified as an invariant relationship, i.e., an iron law of the material world of Nature is ACCEPTABLE. The modern scientific method is the same and only adds statistical coefficiencies to the classical scientific method.

Stat coefficiency is a heursitic device that is most helpful in fields like ethics based on public agreements in THIS WORLD OF HUMAN SOCIETY on how humans OUGHT to behave in the here and now, and not in some fantasy world beyond the boundaries of human understanding, conscience, and social responsibility towards human society. Being a bounder that trespasses the boundaries of human understanding fantazing on objects which are not of possible experience is not only bad, but is often the path to madness and sociopathic criminality.[/size][/b]

[Yujike]

I can't believe I finished reading all this crap!!

The old fat commie is winning with the biggest words and convoluted phrasing ever in the history of posting at PR.com.and they all mean absolutely NOTHING!! He is actually a very simple writer then looks up all the difficult words that mean the same and exchanges them for "palabras de domingo", so he can impress himself. Kudos for spell-checking!!

The Pornorican nutjob is winning with the most hate words and confessing that he actually loves the old Ho_Chi_Ming dearly and that he is GOD himself reincarnate. His Hannibal the Cannibal characterization deserves an Oscar. Also, he should be commended for his matery of statistical analysis for the many useless courses he has taken in the matter.
Looking forward to the next round.

[Eddier1]

Again, you are a fool...a big self-decieved fool. The god of your ego is pretty fat with itself. That's why you chose atheism so you could be SUPREME inside your head.

Heh, the fathead has spit out his insults again. One post is like another, a diatribe of hate and violent threat. Now, the passe use of "dude" is to dehumanise the opposition.
He will need better tricks than that to be considered anything except a mudslinger on this forum.

It is hilarious that he deludes himself that he has gotten himself into my head and has created phony, false, fake viewpoints as to what goes on there -- when it is his own headless status of trying to dynamically project his own unbalanced egoism on others.

The idiot is incapable of understanding that no true commie can be an egotist. He can't understand that to be a commie, one must join the communal mind set of the people. And in the process all individualism is annihilated. Supreme this or that of an individual is destroyed.

Spitting in the face of religionist maniacs is a waste of time. And so is trying to reason with a born-fool who can't see the shams of the capitalists, nor how he is duped by 9-11 and the Iraq invasion, both of which are the U.S. gov't using terrorism to advance the neo con agenda of destroying the nationalism of the U.S. and turning to globalism and one world totalitarian gov't. Yes it is the U.S. gov't, which also sponsored Ben Ladin in Afghanistan that is the source of all terrorism in the world today.

The dark preacher fundie can't see how he is being destroyed and conned by the U.S. gov't; all he sees is the old cold war, which ended a long, long time ago and has absolutely no relevance today.

He may have driven Yuji the clown nuts with his hateful ways, but with commies he will fail forever, since he can't destroy the great treasury of the living ideological education of scientific socialism. Attacking a commie is hollering up a hollow, like a crazed wolf while being unable to refute the principles of communism from the standpoint of a failed and expiring capitalism that is using subterfuge through sponsoring terrorism in the world.

What a joke is the war on terrorism!, when the terrorists themselves are the neo con controlled U.S. gov't. Of course, the DARK PREACHER is too stupid to perceive any of this, and instead continues vomiting his idiotic, egocentric garbage on this forum. He may have driven Yuji the clown insane, but that's all!

Note; Yuji, I'm a thin commie, but really I have nothing against those that are by nature fat. And why you turned on me is answered most probably by what AR has done to you. You now hate not only the extreme right on the political spectrum, but also the absolute left, and are into playing the two ends against the middle for your own convenience. You are the individualist out for himself that the dark preacher hates beyond all reasoning.

[AnotherRican]

Originally Posted by Eddier1

The idiot is incapable of understanding that no true commie can be an egotist. He can't understand that to be a commie, one must join the communal mind set of the people. And in the process all individualism is annihilated. Supreme this or that of an individual is destroyed.

You make three mortal mistakes:

1) The obliteration of the individual. YOu ASSume that individualism is automatically egoism. The reality of history has proven that when you carry out what you propose for humanity, that it degrades quickly into an abusive despotic society where everyone lives in fear and darkness. You want to take civilization into another hell. Everyone becomes a lifeless cog in the machine to satisfy a few thugs in power who are full of themselves (much like you).

2) You second grand mistake is that you assume that living for "the peoples" subjugates the ego. That is a total farce. In living for "the peoples" your ego can take on the victim mode or the aggrandizement mode (as with atheists like you). Ego is very much alive. External obedience to the State by guns and force only veils it. Of course, those with the guns are full of themselves.

3) You make the mistake that you kill life by killing individualism. You no longer matter. You disappear. You are just a useful fool for the system run by thugs. YOu are expendable. You mean NOTHING! The obliteration of individualism is a purely Satanic and most Evil construct. It was inspired by the greatest of all thugs, Lucifer. You swallowed his trash and ended up a most egotistical INDIVIDUAL!!!!!

[Eddier1]

When will the dark preacher stop his bullcrap about egotism, and get down to addressing the important issues of terrorism, as indicated in my last post concerning the U.S. through its neo con clique being the sponsor for terrorism in the world?

The DP continually evades the issues and drowns himself in an ocean of psychologically projecting his own problems of his sick ego.

Dealing with the important issues is beyond his fanatical straightjacket, and he can only scour the web for articles on the side of the U.S. terrorists, and post them here on the forum. It is either a feast of his ego problems or a famine as to thinking critically about the important issues.

It is a waste of time to expect that a creature as defective in critical thinking as he is would be able to contribute anything meaningful on a forum. It is easy to see through the neo con's anarcho fascism, which boxes him in, and which is only vented by slandering anyone or anything that threatens the neo con agenda.

[AnotherRican]

Hey Ego-man... you are conveniently labeling only what you want addressed as valid. You have continously evaded points, including all the three that I addressed to you in the last post. You run like an arrogant chicken. You violate your own atheistic standard. You are a hipocrite!

As for critical thinking, pleeeease don't play the pseudo-scientific talk crap here. You are no more a "critical thinker" than a bottle-cap is.

As far as your idiotic theory that Conservatives are responsible for world terrorism, it only shows how low you have come in trying to survive your amoeba existence. With your view that individualism is to be extinguished, that puts you into the certifiably sick range. Your fat atheistic ego has blinded you.

Originally Posted by Eddier1

When will the dark preacher stop his bullcrap about egotism, and get down to addressing the important issues of terrorism, as indicated in my last post concerning the U.S. through its neo con clique being the sponsor for terrorism in the world?

The DP continually evades the issues and drowns himself in an ocean of psychologically projecting his own problems of his sick ego.

Dealing with the important issues is beyond his fanatical straightjacket, and he can only scour the web for articles on the side of the U.S. terrorists, and post them here on the forum. It is either a feast of his ego problems or a famine as to thinking critically about the important issues.

It is a waste of time to expect that a creature as defective in critical thinking as he is would be able to contribute anything meaningful on a forum. It is easy to see through the neo con's anarcho fascism, which boxes him in, and which is only vented by slandering anyone or anything that threatens the neo con agenda.