|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Dorcas,
The difference is is simple and clear. Virginia and the other common-wealths have proper representation in congress, senate, etc... Puerto Rico does not. I may not agree with the tactic and even the visions of some independent party members. What I do agree with them is that Puerto Rico is no common-wealth but a simple territory. Look it up and you shall see for yourself. |
|
|||
|
I think Puerto Rico has a Congressman. I know is extremely important it can't vote for a presidendial candidate and the mayority has a different skin tone, but what is the excuse that Puerto Rico and the U.S have for this??
|
|
|||
|
The term "commonwealth" goes back to Cromwells England,
but when applied to the four states who chose to refer to themselves as commonwealths(Pa.,Va.,Ma.,Ky.) it has no legal difference or status to a state, plain and simple they are states, some will try to confuse the issue by saying that P.R. can be a commonwealth like PA. well to do that Puerto Rico must become a state. Puerto Rico has a "congressman" which has voice but no vote which is useless. Puerto Rico at this time is a self-governing territory of the U.S. which according to the constitution is subject to the whims of congress under the territorial clause. [This message has been edited by EL BORICUA (edited 12 October 2000).] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|