Marxism and Philosohy

[El_Jibaro]

[b][i]So, are you DENYING what is going on in North Korea?

[Camano]

No layalist you are my god!
Can you explain to me how your church
did all the nice things that I mentioned before?
I really do not understand My grateful God!

[Camano]

Suki you did bring an important point.

Ed. Some religions have their way of seeing things.
I also think that our ideologies behave the same way. When Lenin died there was a split within the party.
This split should have been part of the politics of the
socialist nation of the time. The individual who was killed
in Mexico in 1940 was a big mistake. I think this individual was a great camarada.

[Suki]

Originally posted by Camano
Suki you did bring an important point.

Ed. Some religions have their way of seeing things.
I also think that our ideologies behave the same way. When Lenin died there was a split within the party.
This split should have been part of the politics of the
socialist nation of the time. The individual who was killed
in Mexico in 1940 was a big mistake. I think this individual was a great camarada.

Would that be Leon Trotsky Camano?

Just being una intrusa....lol.

Eddie, my e-mail has been off and weird all weekend...I emailed you but I don't know if you got any of it....Como estas?

Suki.

[Eddier1]

[quote]Originally posted by Suki
[b]

Originally posted by Camano
Suki you did bring an important point.

Ed. Some religions have their way of seeing things.
I also think that our ideologies behave the same way. When Lenin died there was a split within the party.
This split should have been part of the politics of the
socialist nation of the time. The individual who was killed
in Mexico in 1940 was a big mistake. I think this individual was a great camarada.

Would that be Leon Trotsky Camano?

Just being una intrusa....lol.

Eddie, my e-mail has been off and weird all weekend...I emailed you but I don't know if you got any of it....Como estas? Quote.


Suki;

Do you recall how I told you that when I was a child, I was so taken by a book on social anthropology that came into my possession that I have forever after considered that field of study as one of my favorites?

Well, in those days I was a child and thought as a child, and so. therefore, I was excited by the many cultures and peoples who exhibited numerous similarities and differences with regard to religionist notions. And, of course, in my excitement I was attracted most to the similarities as providing, perhaps, evidence of the "truth" of those religionist notions and/or beliefs. I downplayed the differences so that I could enjoy the similarities which at that time I speculated might be the real truth. But when I got older, and had read and studied more deeply into these matters, I put away such childish notions, and saw that the real truth was not to be found in the many manifestations of similarities between numerous people and their religionist "cultures".

In fact, (putting aside the many centuries of religionist wars and the horrors of bigotry like inquisitions, the rack and the iron maiden, that history records; and which is even current in our times in the horrible wars between the Jews and the Moslems, and the Hindus and the followers of Islam), I can categorically say that the REAL TRUTH is NOT found in the counting of cultures and their similarities and differences, nor, of course, is it found in the COUNTING OF HEADS with similar views and/or differences, regardless of how powerful democracy has become as a tool for ruling people and multipluralistic cultures. All of the latter, only impedes human understanding in its quest for the real truth, and makes fools out of those who become bounders in their irrational efforts to break through the boundaries or limitations of human understanding. Sure those bounders extol the `happiness' they say they have in their religionist notions and beliefs. But their's is not real happiness; how could it be when it is not based on real truth?

Real truth is based on measure and symmetry, the harmonious energy and peace of thought and contemplation that the human understanding alone provides when the integrity of its boundaries are not violated. In other words, when the mind stays within itself, then it is truly a fountain whose springs are sweet and clear,i.e., real truth and justice flowing down most satisfactorily in harmony with the concepts of pure reason within the human mind.

Sinceremente suyo,
EddieR
:Y muchas gracias por darme la informacion sobre las senas de su servicio de ecartas.
__________________
Eddier1

[Camano]

Yes Suki you are correct.
Due to this action within the left in the Soviet Union
it isolated itself from academia. Academia became part
of the politics and that is wrong due to the fact that hypothesis and theories were not able to flow to develop
an anti-thesis.

[Eddier1]

Originally posted by Camano
Yes Suki you are correct.
Due to this action within the left in the Soviet Union
it isolated itself from academia. Academia became part
of the politics and that is wrong due to the fact that hypothesis and theories were not able to flow to develop
an anti-thesis.

Oh come on Camano! Everyone who has an ounce of sense and interest in these matters of the intra-factional disputes of the party politics of communism knows what Trotskyism is.

If Trotskyism is not an antithesis to true communism, then I don't know what could possibly be such an antithesis.

If you are a Trotskyite, why don't you simply come out and say it, and stop beating around the bush?

Regards,
EddieR