Marxism and Philosohy

[Camano]

No Ed. I am not beating around the bush. During the division of the party Stalin did not have to do what he did.
No, Troyskyism is not the true ideal of communism but I think that it would have helped the left in general. Many parties became like the church, dogmatic.

[Eddier1]

Originally posted by Camano
No Ed. I am not beating around the bush. During the division of the party Stalin did not have to do what he did.
No, Troyskyism is not the true ideal of communism but I think that it would have helped the left in general. Many parties became like the church, dogmatic.

Camano; first Nietzche, then Trotsky, and both used the same fascist technique of make trouble, make trouble, until their doom; Nietzche dead from syphilus infection of his brain, and Trotsky dead at the hand of the Spaniard communist who supported the Republican gov't of Spain, and who was ordered by the old NKVD to assassinate the Russian fuerher to be, viz. Leon Trotsky.

And that Spaniard, Merceder, did it by putting a ICE AXE PICK INTO TROTSKY'S DICTATORIAL, DOGMATIC BRAIN. Trotskyism is the real dogmatism you are toying with, Camano. And not the iron discipline of the communist party, which BY PRINCIPLE GUIDES THE PROLETARIAT, i.e., the working class. That principle of a guide to action is NOT dogmatism of any type, form , nor shape. If you want to deal with communist matters, you best get that principle into your brain, eh. Don't you think?

Regards,
EddieR